Throw into the mix a bit of misunderstanding as to how WSA works. Then there are always the varied surfing habits of different users that are not being accounted for in every instance. I personally don't like to run but one AV even if it is supposed to be a companion AV like WSA or EAM. Even then I have noticed that it plays nicer with some AV's than others. It's a companion AV but it still has to be configured differently as compared to running it all alone. Proper configuration can be an issue, too, especially if WSA is being run alongside another AV. In fact I have never had a single issue with FP's while running WSA for the last two years and change. I use Shadow Defender (have for years) and have never once received a FP from WSA flagging it as malicious. Neither issue was wide spread and not common to WSA. There were also a few complaints about browser freeze ups with WSA installed back a few years ago. it stopped everything i threw at it by either stopping it from running or killing it on reboot.Ĭlick to expand.Years ago Webroot Spysweeper caused some issues with Windows freezing up. Otherwise im a huge fan and so far i have yet to be able to get infected with it and i actually tried to purposely on a few occasions. When i know im going to be downloading a file now i have learned to either shut off webroot (which i know is not the best solution but it can be aggravating) or let the download finish then continue on my way. meaning if you have say 3 things downloading and you are browsing around and hit a site that webroot flags (which is a different site then your downloads are coming from) it will entirely kill your connection briefly which then kills all the downloads and you have to start them all over again. The only other reall annoyance for me is with the firewall when it detects something on just one website it will kill ALL internet connection. and of late i have had a few more false positives from it. for me the annoying thing i have with webroot is being part of mozilla ux it still flags the updater as being a trojan and i have sent it to support on a few occasions and is still flagged. im second to eset ess which is VERY light for a suite. In general it's a bit pricy but check around because it's on sale at Amazon and through some other online merchants. If you look around right now you will find some very good deals on WSA. He knows as much about WSA as anybody and he knows what will run well along side WSA if you choose to add another AV. Ask guest Polaris here in this forum about WSA because he runs it on his laptop I believe. The rollback feature it has will restore the system to its previous safe state. With WSA even if a baddie did initially slip through it's really a moot point. Comodo and Norton employ similar strategies. The product does a phenomenal job at protecting a clean system from infection. Not to mention the fact that you will not need another AV if you have WSA. WSA is supposed to be a companion AV and you can theoretically run it with another AV, but why bother? It does a great job all by itself, and if lightness is a primary goal, then you are just defeating the purpose by adding another AV. You can configure WSA so it will ask you on all outbound traffic if you want to allow just once or every time. There is no way you'll find anything else that runs so light. I have Webroot SecureAnywhere Complete running along with the Windows 7 firewall and I can tell you it has zero impact on system resources.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |